Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Hard to be human again: Kill List (2011).


Kill List is a messy movie, literally and figuratively. There's a lot going on within its lean 95 minutes, and more than a few viewers did not hesitate to call foul. Roger Ebert—a brilliant critic whose prose style nonetheless usually leaves something to be desired—struck the bullseye in his review, delivering an appropriately jumbled verdict: "It's baffling and goofy, blood-soaked and not boring. That it's well-made adds to the confusion; it feels like a better film than it turns out to be." 

But what's really maddening is the fact that, well, it is a better film than it turns out to be. Part kitchen-sink crime story, part jagged suburban nightmare, and part Wicker Man homage, Kill List is ambitious, brutal, and mesmerizingbut it's also murky, asymmetrical, and hard to like. It's reminiscent of the work of Michael Haneke (Funny Games) and Gaspar Noé (Irreversible) in that it combines precise, expert craftsmanship with decisions that seem designed to purposefully alienate the viewer. It's the kind of movie you can't stop rolling around in your head after watching it—partly because you're probably trying to settle on whether you actually liked it or not.

It's definitely a horror movie, but in a very particular way. There's nothing supernatural or otherworldly on tap here, only the sordid ugliness of man. The film revolves around Jay (Neil Maskell) and Gal (Michael Smiley), a pair of soldiers-turned-contract killers who go to work for a mysterious, sinister "Client." Despite their grim vocation, Jay and Gal are wisely depicted as ordinary, likable men who happen to kill people for a living. Gal is the archetypal charming Irish rogue, while Jay is a high-strung but loving family man whose tumultuous relationship with his wife (MyAnna Buring) is one of the film's focal points; the film opens with a domestic screaming match over their vanishing bank account.

A tense dinner party scene early in the film is as absorbing as any of the murders seen later, perfectly capturing the kind of casual cruelties and simmering resentments that mark a marriage balanced on a razor's edge over financial ruin. Before we come to know the central duo as killers, we come to know them as people.


As it happens, Gal is also a Catholic (albeit more culturally than anything) while Jay and his wife are unrepentant atheists (reminder #2 that you're not watching an American movie, after the acccents), and the first target on their list turns out to be a priest. But this fact proves to be little more than a speed bump, as Gal casually notes that they should be thankful that their quarry isn't a little kid; unlike a lot of movies with the familiar "no women, no kids" hitman's code of honor, you get the sense that working class anti-heroes Jay and Gal probably would take a job targeting women and children—but they would do so reluctantly, and they certainly wouldn't be happy about it. There is little moralizing in Kill List, and what we do get is agreeably warped, like when one of our anti-heroes makes the hilariously qualified claim that "I've hardly done any terrible shit."

The relationship between Jay and Gal is the best part of Kill List, and in their rough-edged gallows humor and back-slapping camaraderie we can recognize our own friends, brothers, fathers and sons. But their separation from us is also total, because, after all, they kill people people for a living. And they do so very dispassionately: while plotting how to attack the priest, Jay makes a joke about how they should probably surveil him for a while rather than just shooting him down on the street in a hail of bullets, and his affect is akin to an office worker discussing a broken copier.

And indeed, the violence in Kill List is sudden, drained of glamor, and almost casual. It's also sometimes quite hard to watch, even for a seasoned veteran of horror film gross-outs like myself. There's a scene with a hammer that puts even Drive's to shame in terms of sheer visceral impact; it's in the same category as the stomach-churning opening scene from Frayed, although I don't know if it quite outstrips that one.


You may not be surprised to discover that as the film goes on, things get worse. Maskell's performance proves to be one of the film's greatest assets as Jay becomes increasingly unglued, a simmering cauldron of post-traumatic anger and violence. Again, there are no overt horror histrionics on display, and that's part of what makes the film so strangely successful: Kill List positively seethes with menace, and it does so without falling back on stale cliches. A big contribution comes from Jim Williams' music and Martin Pavey's sound design, filling everyday shots of suburban streets and neatly trimmed lawns with baleful, ominous dissonance.

[Warning: spoilers ahead.]

It all leads up to the ending, which is the point where you decide whether your accounts of the movie to friends will be filled with cursing. All along the way the film has been scattering breadcrumbs suggesting that there's something even more ominous at work beyond casual brutality and murder for hire; you get the sense that "the Client" may have enlisted Jay and Gal in service to some kind of dark pagan lord or tentacled elder god, slouching towards Sheffield to be born.

The film's climax is interesting for how on the nose it is, considering that Kill List is a film that seems to delight in vagueness and questions left unanswered (e.g. what happened to Jay and Gal in Kiev). But it also works, almost in spite of itself; the finale is full of eerie visual details and assaulting sonics that seem like the logical culmination of the whole film's patient, boiling sense of dread.

The biggest problem with the film's last moments is sort of an accident of timing: they are remarkably similar to the ending of A Serbian FilmSrđan Spasojević's controversial 2010 shocker, and both movies seem to share nearly identical story arcs. But these movies are awfully close to each other chronologically for Kill List to be consciously emulating A Serbian Film, which makes me think they arrived at their respective twists of the knife independently. 

And if you ask me, Kill List works better than its more notorious counterpart on every level. When I finally got around to seeing A Serbian Film, the latest entry in the "most transgressive film ever made" sweepstakes, I was a little surprised and disappointed at how cartoonish it was—a judgment that seems borne out by Spasojević and writer Aleksandar Radivojević's comments that the film was apparently intended as a parody of political correctness (a message that may or may not be supported by the end product).


As shock cinema's latest enfant terribleA Serbian Film is certainly disturbing—but it's also so gleefully over-the-top that its final dark revelation seems painfully obvious, and as a result lacks the revolting horror it should properly have. The vibe of Kill List is entirely different: it's The Jesus Lizard to A Serbian Film's Cannibal Corpse ("Hammer Smashed Face" allusion entirely intentional), eschewing rote signifiers of brutality in favor of something rawer and more genuinely disorienting. There's a brilliant moment right after the film's final reveal, when the frame freezes and a grating feedback tone sweeps up to nearly deafening volume—and for a second, I really didn't know what would happen next. Would we cut to the credits? Would Jay's head suddenly explode? Would my TV? Would Satan, laughing, spread his wings?

Some movies are easy to like. It's virtually impossible to honestly hate on something like, say, Shaun of the Dead. But Kill List is not such a movie. It never seems like it cares about winning you over, but it also doesn't seem like it's trying to piss you off; it's never sophomoric or exploitative. It just is—and as such, it's very much in the native British tradition of "kitchen sink" filmmaking. It's messy, difficult, harsh, and overwhelming. But somehow, almost in spite of itself, it's also very good.

Monday, August 13, 2012

Horror noise goody bag: unpacking the new Blue Sabbath Black Cheer.

I'm not usually one to wig out over new vinyl. This is because

(1) Literally everyone is a record collector now;

(2) Most new vinyl releases these days are reissues of records that sucked the first time, cynically repressed by those hoping to cash in on the bubble before it bursts; and most importantly,

(3) I am a contrarian asshole.

That said, I was blown away by the insanely lavish new Blue Sabbath Black Cheer release, The Boundary Between the Living and the Deceased Dissolved, on Equation Records. This is the fanciest physical release I've seen since the Floor box set, and frankly it makes that fine product look like a 10th generation mix tape caked in vomit.

But shitty pictures are worth the proverbial thousand words:


Here's the cover, complete with glare obscuring the awesome artwork. That neat sticker lets you know all about the cornucopia of goodies you're about to crack open, like a sugar-addled child busting up a piñata.


The two LP sleeves are held together with MAGNETS! (Hold your ICP jokes please.) I thought this was pretty ingenious. I hate gatefold sleeves though.


Okay, so here's what's on tap in the first sleeve. You get a one-sided etched 7 inch which is dedicated to The Cherry Point, and--surprise!--features crunchy, HNW style rumble. Honestly I probably won't ever listen to it again (7 inches, especially one-sided ones, really aren't the ideal HNW format if you ask me), but it does come with a  bunch of neat little art cards. And you also  get a boatload of stickers (featuring uplifting messages like "FUCK YOUR SCENE" and "IT DOESN'T MATTER WHEN YOU ARE DEAD"), plus a giant, '80s-style 2" button with a little piece of the cover artwork! And wait, is that a fucking slipmat in there?


Yep. Pretty sick! (Also, the 7" is red, a fact sure to please all the dorks who still think colored vinyl is the most revolutionary invention since movable type. You also get the label from the etched side, so that you can glue it onto some other 7 inch and confuse yourself later.)


So what's in sleeve number two? Well, you get the album itself, which is also one-sided and features a beautiful silkscreen on the flip side (see below). There's more gorgeous inserts, a numbered certificate (out of 235) and even a kind of BSBC sampler CD with rare and unreleased stuff! I really appreciated this last, as most labels would've been content to throw in a download code or just neglect digital altogether--but I still love CDs, and it's cool to get extra songs on top of the LP.


Here's the gnarly silkscreen. The LP itself shreds too: it's more in the vein of "classic" BSBC than the 7 inch, starting off with ominous chiming cymbals and gradually snowballing into a blizzard of graveyard noise.


There's also a special message ("READ ME FIRST" at the top) detailing an unfortunate printing/shipping mishap where the ink was still wet when it got put in the white inner sleeve. 
"We apologize for this faux pas. But, on the plus side, extricating this record will involve a little wanton vandalism: ripping, tearing, and injury to the sleeve - which is condoned by the band and heartily encouraged; especially while listening to the other audio contents of this package." 
The message says nearly every copy was affected, but actually I don't think mine was, as the 12" slid out of the sleeve with no problems. I like to think some collector nerd out there is stewing in anguish over this, while I feel a little cheated that I didn't get to rip my record out of its sleeve like a Kali-worshipping witch doctor tearing out some Christian missionary's heart.


What's inside the CD sleeve? More stickers! Again, with most releases you'd count yourself lucky to get a single sticker, but Equation and BSBC throw enough at you to wallpaper your mini-fridge with grim propaganda.

 

I forgot to mention you also get a sweet 12" x 24" poster of the cover art! Here's a better worse different picture, taken after I threw it into a spare frame I had lying around for that letterboxed effect:


So, all in all, pretty awesome. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that this is one of the coolest releases I've ever seen. It costs $36 and is apparently being sold at cost, a claim which I totally believe. I think it's definitely worth the scratch if you're even a casual fan of BSBC; if Corrupted releases were packed with this much cool stuff I'd feel a lot better about paying $30+ for them. (Of course, if Corrupted ever makes the complete archival box set I've dreamed of, it will probably make this look like an RRRecords release and cost approximately $10,000.)

Like I said, it's limited to 235 copies and I don't know how many are left, but check it out at http://www.chronoglide.com/Equation_releases.html.

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Tweets ahead: Detention (2011).


Before we proceed, it should also be noted that Detention is a movie that, on paper, I thought I would absolutely hate. Everything I read described it as a fast-paced, disorienting paean to the mash-up age, a kind of Scream for the Twitter era. And while this description is apt, it also fails to do justice to what makes this movie so special: namely, its middle-finger intelligence (pictured), kinetic visual style, and a boundless enthusiasm that manages to break through its own Kevlar vest of referential irony to deliver something surprisingly thoughtful, and even touching.

But Detention is very much a love-it-or-hate-it movie. The algorithmic magic of Rotten Tomatoes suggests that coin-flip figure should be revised upward: I was honestly a little surprised to find that the film has a lowly 31% rating. But the user reviews tell a different story, with Detention earning a solid 66%.

Is this evidence of the yawning generation gap between a stodgy cadre of baby boomer film critics and a younger viewership of smartphone-wielding teenage hooligans? Or is it the same old critical snobbery towards anything even resembling horror that we've seen hundreds of times before?


Sony Pictures gamely attempts to summarize Detention as an "apocalyptic fantasy, horror, science fiction, action-thriller, body swapping, time-traveling teen romantic comedy", but even this mouthful falls short of capturing the film's dizzying sweep. Put simply, Detention is the teen movie to end all teen movies.

It's a 500 MPH live-action comic book gene-splice, with dominant and recessive traits from Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Skins, John Hughes, Shaun of the Dead, Degrassi (if upgraded to a hard R), Heathers, Mark Millar, Buckaroo Banzai, Clueless, and about a thousand other reference points that whiz by like bullets fired from a pop culture AK-47.

In the growing pantheon of self-aware horror films, Detention occupies a unique niche: it may not be quite as charming as Shaun of the Dead or as artfully composed as Behind the Mask, but it has so much youthful zeal and raw energy that it nonetheless shoots straight to the head of the pack. And compared to, say, Shaun of the Dead's expert mix of horror and humor—a balance which could probably be confirmed by an electron microscope—Detention leans much further towards comedy, with the horror usually arriving as a welcome, bloody surprise.


I really think the closest point of comparison for Detention's singular style is Dan Harmon's brilliant and beloved sitcom Community, which seems to win critical esteem in direct proportion to how fast Detention loses it. Grizzly Lake and Greendale CC feel like they come from the same universe: the "schmitty"-spouting teen twerps that torment Jeff and Britta in one episode could have escaped from Riley's science class, and a slightly younger Abed would blend seamlessly into the film's cast (where he would instantly recognize Riley's Angela Chase costume at Sander's party).

Yet Community earns endless (and well-deserved!) critical accolades while Detention languishes, far from earning even a "Fresh" rating. Why? Again, blame the generation gap: while Community often culls material from fare like My Dinner With Andre or John Woo's The Killer, Detention's more masscult sensibility alludes to decidedly gauche sources like Steven Seagal or Saw.

But one piece of Detention's technicolor pop mosaic stands out to me as evidence of the subtle taste and sophistication that makes it so special: despite very ample opportunity, filmmaker Joseph Kahn resists the impulse to make his Breakfast Club references anything but oblique. Like fireworks prior to child safety regulations, postmodernism is a dangerous toy: witness the cloying, candy-binge preciousness of Juno, or the painfully try-hard pyrotechnics of Scott Pilgrim Vs. the World. But Detention is the movie that these and many other entries of the past few years were supposed to be.


Sometimes Detention admittedly feels more like a series of vignettes than a movie, and towards the end the quantum whipcracks of the plot do become a little vertigo-inducing. But that's all part of the fun, and also part of the point in a movie which features at least half a dozen kitchen sinks. 

Plus, it's hard to complain when there are so many loopy highlights: a hilariously left-field, Spider-Man style digression regarding the origins of "TV Hand"; a movie-within-a-movie-within-a-movie-within-a-movie; a deadpan tour through 19 years of pop fashion courtesty of "the silent enigma" Elliot Fink (Detention's equivalent of Pulp Fiction's dance contest); and the alien abduction of an extraterrestrial, time-traveling bear. (Yes, really.)

So, watch Detention. Realize that there's a good chance you'll hate it—but if you do, you can at least take comfort in the fact that you're not alone. 

Then again, maybe you're just old.